Management Model Based on Profes รูปแบบการบริหารตามแนวคิดชุมชนแห่งการเรียนรู้ทางวิชาชีพ ผ่านกระบวนการบริหารคุณภาพ SPDCA เพื่อพัฒนาการจัดการเรียนรู้เชิงรุก โรงเรียนบ้านจอมพระ สำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษาสุรินทร์ เขต 1
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65205/ajgs.2026.e2725Keywords:
รูปแบบการบริหาร, ชุมชนแห่งการเรียนรู้ทางวิชาชีพ, SPDCAAbstract
Title : Management Model Based on Professional Learning Community Concept
Through SPDCA Quality Management Process to Develop Active Learning
Management at Ban Chomphra School, Surin Primary Educational
Service Area Office 1
Reporter : Mr. Amondej Deenan
Academic Year : 2023-2024
This research aimed to (1) to examine the current conditions and needs of professional learning communities using the SPDCA process to enhance active learning management; (2) to design and validate a school management model based on the PLC concept through the SPDCA process; (3) to implement the developed model in a real school context; and (4) to evaluate the model’s appropriateness and practical usefulness for application in educational settings.
The research employed a Research and Development (R&D) methodology consisting of four phases: Phase 1 involved surveying the current conditions and needs using questionnaires with 32 teachers; Phase 2 focused on designing the management model and validating it with 10 experts; Phase 3 involved implementing the model with the same group of 32 teachers; and Phase 4 evaluated the model’s appropriateness and usefulness based on teacher feedback. The research instruments included questionnaires and evaluation forms. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics including frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and t-test.
The results showed that: (1) the current state of both PLC implementation and active learning management was rated at a moderate level, while the need for development in both areas was rated at the highest level; (2) the developed management model consisted of six core components: principles, objectives, content, process, assessment and evaluation, and implementation conditions. The experts rated the model as highly accurate and feasible. Similarly, the user manual for the model was evaluated as accurate and practical; (3) the implementation of the model led to significant improvements in teachers’ active learning management, with statistically significant differences (p < .05) observed in four aspects: knowledge, skills, attitudes, and motivation; and (4) the evaluation of the model’s appropriateness and usefulness by the teachers indicated a high level of appropriateness and the highest level of practical usefulness.
Keywords:, Management Model, Professional Learning Community,Quality Management Process, , Active learning.
References
Atsawaphum, S. (2023). Professional learning community and teacher development in active learning. Bangkok: Ministry of Education.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: The George Washington University.
Chaiwong, P. (2021). Development of PLC model to enhance active learning in rural schools. Journal of Educational Administration and Development, 15(2), 45–60.
Daranee Payakkul. (2018). Elements of learning management for educational success. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work: Best practices for enhancing student achievement. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree.
Erawan, P. (2022). Leading active learning through collaborative PLC and quality cycle. Journal of Education Research and Development, 8(1), 22–33.
Eison, J. (1991). Active learning strategies. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Fuangthong, A. (2021). Applying PLC to promote teachers’ active learning skills. Thai Journal of Teacher Professional Development, 13(1), 77–85.
Hairon, S., & Tan, C. (2017). Professional learning communities in Singapore and Shanghai: Implications for teacher collaboration. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 525–540.
Ivancevich, J. M., Lorenzi, P., Skinner, S. J., & Crosby, P. B. (1989). Management: Quality and competitiveness. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
Jaroonsak, J. (2020). Developing teacher competency through collaborative coaching models. Journal of Educational Innovation, 11(2), 91–108.
Jutamas Permpooncharoenyot. (2018). Development of active learning model through smart classroom. Master’s thesis, Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University.
Khammani, T. (2014). Teaching and learning management: Design for learning success. Bangkok : Chulalongkorn University Press.
Samut Sompong. (2015). Developing a professional learning community model through PDCA process. Master’s thesis, Buriram Rajabhat University.
Sirisuk, S. (2022). Active learning and PLC integration for teacher development. Journal of Learning Innovation, 6(1), 41–52.
Srisuk, S. (2022). Systematic development of teachers via SPDCA. Research and Development Journal, 4(2), 34–50.
Srisukhu, S. (2019). A model for active learning through PDCA for secondary schools. Secondary Educational Service Area Office 33.
Tamoczi, E. (2006). The concept of professional learning communities. University of Debrecen.
Thananyalak Wetchakama. (2017). A model for enhancing English teaching competency in primary schools. Doctoral dissertation, Mahasarakham University.
Viroj Sararatna. (2015). Standards for educational evaluation. Bangkok: SE-ED Education.
Wihan Palapon. (2015). Competency development models for teachers. Journal of Teacher Development, 3(1), 55–70
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Academic Journal of Graduate School
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
