Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Simple Electric Circuits and Friction Before and After Hands-on Laboratory Activities Using a Mobile Science Laboratory
Main Article Content
Abstract
Limited access to laboratory equipment can restrict opportunities for students in small schools to engage in practical science learning. The Mobile Science Laboratory of Surindra Rajabhat University provides a flexible outreach platform that transports laboratory equipment, learning materials, lecturers, staff, and university students to schools according to their educational needs. This study aimed to (1) implement hands-on laboratory activities on simple electric circuits and friction using the Mobile Science Laboratory and (2) compare students’ conceptual understanding before and after participation. A one-group pretest–posttest design with descriptive analysis was employed. The participants were 76 Grade 9 students from a small opportunity-expansion school in Surin Province, Thailand. Two researcher-developed conceptual understanding tests, each consisting of 10 four-option multiple-choice items, were administered before and after the corresponding laboratory activities. Complete response sets were available from 76 students for simple electric circuits and 59 students for friction. Item-level percentages of correct responses were compared descriptively. The results showed higher posttest percentages for all 10 simple electric circuit items. For friction, posttest percentages were higher for nine of the 10 items, although the magnitude of change varied and some concepts remained difficult. Overall, the findings indicate positive descriptive changes in students’ test performance, particularly for simple electric circuits. The Mobile Science Laboratory provides a practical approach to expanding access to hands-on science learning in small and resource-limited schools.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Besson, U., Borghi, L., de Ambrosis, A., & Mascheretti, P. (2010). A three-dimensional approach and open source structure for the design and experimentation of teaching-learning sequences: The case of friction. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1289–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903023350
Corpuz, E. G., & Rebello, N. S. (2007). Hands‐On and Minds‐On Modeling Activities to Improve Students’ Conceptions of Microscopic Friction. AIP Conference Proceedings, 951(1), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2820950
Engelhardt, P. V., & Beichner, R. J. (2004). Students’ understanding of direct current resistive electrical circuits. American Journal of Physics, 72(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1614813
Goldschmidt, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2016). Learning About Genetic Engineering in an Outreach Laboratory: Influence of Motivation and Gender on Students’ Cognitive Achievement. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 6(2), 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2015.1031293
Jaakkola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008). Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 271–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00259.x
Luehmann, A. L., & Markowitz, D. (2007). Science Teachers’ Perceived Benefits of an Out‐of‐school Enrichment Programme: Identity needs and university affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1133–1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690600944429
Nativ Ronen, E., & Tal, T. (2019). Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Science-Day Programs at University-Based Science Outreach Centers. Visitor Studies, 22(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645578.2019.1625634
Rytting, M., Wright, G. A., Shumway, S. L., & Jensen, J. (2019). Comparison of simulation and hands-on labs in helping high school students learn physics concepts. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.5296/IJE.V11I1.14017
Sarapak, C., Jumpatam, J., Lunnoo, T., Kongngarm, N., Raso, S., & Kearns, K. (2025). Comparing 3D virtual labs and traditional labs: Impact on teacher training and student learning in physics education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(4), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i4.21115
Sarapak, C., Kong-In, P., Jindasri, P., Kakkaew, V., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Sumrandee, C., Sreejivungsa, K., Malingam, N., Krongsuk, S., & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Instrument design and validation for enhancing instructional design using the TPACK framework: A study in Surin Province. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(1), 10–24. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1170
Sarapak, C., Luengsiriwan, A., Kong-In, P., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Malingam, N., Hardthakwong, B., & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Conceptual understanding in fundamental and mechanical physics among pre-service physics teachers of Surindra Rajabhat University: A statistic and machine learning analysis. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(2), 80–97. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1171
Sreejivungsa, K., Sarapak, C., Sumrandee, C., Kong-In, P., Jindasri, P., Kakkaew, V., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Malingam, N., Nakchat, O., Hardthakwong, B., & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Enhancing student understanding of basic physics concepts through mobile science experiments: A study at Thung Kula Pittayakom School, Surin Province. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(4), 233–246. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1169
Taşlıdere, E. (2013). Effect of conceptual change oriented instruction on students’ conceptual understanding and decreasing their misconceptions in DC electric circuits. Creative Education, 4(4), 273–282. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.44041
Tsybulsky, D., Dodick, J., & Camhi, J. (2018). High-school students in university research labs? Implementing an outreach model based on the ‘science as inquiry’ approach. Journal of Biological Education, 52(4), 415–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2017.1403360
Zacharia, Z. C., & de Jong, T. (2014). The Effects on Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits of Introducing Virtual Manipulatives Within a Physical Manipulatives-Oriented Curriculum. Cognition and Instruction, 32(2), 101–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2014.887083