Enhancing Student Understanding of Basic Physics Concepts Through Mobile Science Experiments: A Study at Thung Kula Pittayakom School, Surin Province

Main Article Content

Kaniknun Sreejivungsa
Choojit Sarapak
Chalao Sumrandee
Prayut Kong-In
Phana Jindasri
Vasanchai Kakkeaw
Amnuay Wattanakornsiri
Jutamas Yoomark
Nattaphorn Malingam
Birabongse Hardthakwong
Oranuch Nakchat
Thodsaphon Lunnoo

Abstract

Developing effective teaching and learning strategies is crucial for enhancing student learning, particularly in science education, where hands-on activities or experiments are often necessary to facilitate student understanding of scientific concepts. However, a significant challenge faced by many schools is the lack of adequate teaching equipment, which hinders students' ability to engage in practical experimentation. This study focuses on designing and evaluating a series of fundamental physics experiments facilitated by a Mobile Science (MS) vehicle at Thung Kula Pittayakom  (TKP) School in the sub-district of Surin province. The study's primary objectives were to design engaging physics activities that enhance student learning, evaluate students' understanding of physics concepts before and after these activities, and utilize the MS vehicle to deliver the experiments.  Six physics experiments were conducted, including simple circuit assembly, multimeter usage, simple harmonic motion, friction, light refraction, and spring constant. Each activity lasted 90 minutes and involved active student participation. Student comprehension was assessed through pre-tests and post-tests administered before and after the experiments. The results indicated a statistically significant change in scores across all laboratory activities. Specifically, the post-test scores surpassed the pre-test scores in each lab, with average score increases ranging from 3.644 to 5.096 points. These indicated that the experiments' interactive, hands-on nature significantly improved students' grasp of fundamental physics concepts. MS also proved to be an efficient and effective means of organizing these activities, contributing to a positive learning experience. In conclusion, the designed physics experiments successfully engaged students in interactive, practical learning, leading to a deeper understanding of fundamental physics concepts. The MS unit was shown to be a convenient and helpful resource for conducting educational activities in schools. This study provides valuable insights for designing engaging and effective physics learning activities in the future.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Bani-Salameh, H. N. (2017). How persistent are the misconceptions about force and motion held by college students? Physics Education, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/52/1/014003

Besson, U., Borghi, L., De Ambrosis, A. & Mascheretti, P. (2007). How to teach friction: Experiments and models. American Journal of Physics, 75(12), 1106–1113. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2779881

Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for Education: STEM Challenges and Opportunities. NSTA (National Science Teachers Assocation), 33–40. www.nsta.org/permissions.

Bybee, R. W. & Fuchs, B. (2006). Editorial - Preparing the 21st century workforce: A new reform in science and technology education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.20147

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H. & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.1319030111

Gibson, H. L. & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal Impact of an Inquiry-Based Science Program on Middle School Students’ Attitudes Toward Science. Science Education, 86(5), 693–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.10039

Graham, T., Berry, J. & Rowlands, S. (2013). Are “misconceptions” or alternative frameworks of force and motion spontaneous or formed prior to instruction? International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2012.703333

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Herald, S., Philip, G. G., Sharma, A. & Ganguly, P. (2017). Enabling Students with 21st Century Competency Skills for Delivering Innovation. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN EDUCATION METHODOLOGY, 8(1), 1390–1401. https://doi.org/10.24297/IJREM.V8I1.2152

Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty-First Century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.10106

Hsu, Y. S. & Fang, S. C. (2019). Opportunities and challenges of STEM education. Asia-Pacific STEM Teaching Practices: From Theoretical Frameworks to Practices, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0768-7_1

Issaka, M. (2020). Effect of Inquiry-Based Teaching Method on Students Achievement and Retention of Concepts in Integrated Science in Senior High School. TEXILA INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH, 7(2), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.21522/TIJAR.2014.07.02.ART009

Knight, R. D. & Burciaga, J. R. (2004). Five Easy Lessons: Strategies for Successful Physics Teaching. American Journal of Physics, 72(3), 414–414. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1639012

Lamsal, H. (2015). Education for All 2000-2015: Achievements and challenges. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f23e/4ee2e7eeb004775657d137883bcf902fc32b.pdf

Lin, S. Y. & Singh, C. (2012). Using analogical problem solving with different scaffolding supports to learn about friction. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1413, 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3680042

Mazur, Eric. (2014). Peer instruction: a user’s manual. 246.

Nadelson, L. S., Heddy, B. C., Jones, S., Taasoobshirazi, G. & Johnson, M. (2018). Conceptual Change in Science Teaching and Learning: Introducing the Dynamic Model of Conceptual Change. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(2), 151–195. https://doi.org/10.17583/IJEP.2018.3349

Olaogun, O. P., Skelton, A., Zafar, M., Hunsu, N. J. & Idowu, I. A. (2023). A Systematic Review of Student Misconceptions about Electricity and Electric Circuit Concepts. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, FIE. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE58773.2023.10343239

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2168-9830.2004.TB00809.X

Redish, E. F. & Burciaga, J. R. (2004). Teaching Physics with the Physics Suite. American Journal of Physics, 72(3), 414–414. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1691552

Sarapak, C., Kong-In, P., Jindasri, P., Kakkaew, V., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Sumrandee, C., Sreejivungsa, K., Malingam, N. & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Instrument Design and Validation for Enhancing Instructional Design Using the TPACK Framework: A Study in Surin Province. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(1), 10–24. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1170

Sarapak, C., Luengsiriwan, A., Kong-In, P., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Malingam, N., Hardthakwong, B. & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Conceptual Understanding in Fundamental and Mechanical Physics Among Pre-Service Physics Teachers of Surindra Rajabhat University: A Statistic and Machine Learning Analysis. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(2), 80–97. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1171

Sokoloff, D. R. (1996). Teaching Electric Circuit Concepts Using Microcomputer-Based Current/Voltage Probes. Microcomputer–Based Labs: Educational Research and Standards, 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61189-6_7

Sokoloff, D. R. & Thornton, R. K. (1997). Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment. The Physics Teacher, 35(6), 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344715

Trundle, K. C., Atwood, R. K. & Christopher, J. E. (2002). Preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of moon phases before and after instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 633–658. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.10039

Walsh, Y., Magana, A. J. & Feng, S. (2020). Investigating Students’ Explanations about Friction Concepts after Interacting with a Visuohaptic Simulation with Two Different Sequenced Approaches. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(4), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10956-020-09829-5

Zacharia, Z. (2003). Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 792–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.10112