Rotation-Based Astronomy Learning through a Mobile Science Vehicle: Changes in Students’ Celestial Coordinate Conceptual Understanding and Telescope Operation Procedural Knowledge

Main Article Content

Kaniknun Sreejivungsa
Choojit Sarapak
Chalao Sumrandee
Jutamas Yoomark
Prapussorn Buanak
Nongnut Saraphi
Weeraya Singcanipa
Phanthiwa Sakaew
Thirawit Phonkhokkong
Thodsaphon Lunnoo

Abstract

Students in small and resource-limited schools often have limited access to specialized astronomy equipment and practical learning experiences. This study examined changes in secondary school students’ celestial coordinate conceptual understanding and telescope operation procedural knowledge after participation in rotation-based astronomy activities delivered through a university Mobile Science Vehicle. Participants were 105 students in Grades 8–12 from a purposively selected resource-limited school in Surin Province, Thailand. The one-day program comprised three stations: celestial coordinate identification using physical models, simulated sky observation using star charts and a mobile planetarium, and telescope setup and operation. Data were collected using a 10-item Test of Celestial Coordinate Conceptual Understanding (TCCU) and a 10-item Telescope Operation Knowledge Test (TOKT) and analyzed descriptively using percentages of correct responses. Overall TCCU performance increased from 41.77% to 75.60%, a gain of 33.83 percentage points, while TOKT performance increased from 55.52% to 78.00%, a gain of 22.48 percentage points. Item-level results showed that improvement was not uniform; celestial coordinate items 2 and 8 remained particularly difficult, and some telescope operation items showed lower posttest percentages in selected grade levels. The findings indicate higher immediate posttest performance following participation and suggest that the Mobile Science Vehicle can provide a practical mechanism for delivering specialized astronomy resources to resource-limited schools. However, the one-group design, descriptive analysis, and immediate posttest limit causal interpretation.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001

Cole, M., Cohen, C., Wilhelm, J., & Lindell, R. (2018). Spatial thinking in astronomy education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14(1), 010139. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.14.010139

Pineda Caro, D. Y., Valderrama, D. A., & Torres Merchán, N. Y. (2023). Didactic intervention for the teaching of stellar astrometry in field educational contexts. Acta Scientiae, 25(5), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7347

Everding, D. J., & Keller, J. M. (2020). Survey of the academic use of planetariums for undergraduate education. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 16(2), 020128. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.020128

Gould, R., Dussault, M., & Sadler, P. (2007). What’s educational about online telescopes? Evaluating 10 years of MicroObservatory. Astronomy Education Review, 5(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2006022

Long, G. L., Bailey, C. A., Bunn, B. B., Slebodnick, C., Johnson, M. R., Derozier, S., Dana, S. M., & Grady, J. R. (2012). Chemistry outreach project to high schools using a mobile chemistry laboratory, ChemKits, and teacher workshops. Journal of Chemical Education, 89(10), 1249–1258. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200185e

Plummer, J. D. (2014). Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2013.869039

Plummer, J. D., Kocareli, A., & Slagle, C. (2014). Learning to explain astronomy across moving frames of reference: Exploring the role of classroom and planetarium-based instructional contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1083–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.843211

Salimpour, S., Bartlett, S., Fitzgerald, M. T., McKinnon, D. H., Cutts, K. R., James, C. R., Miller, S., Danaia, L., Hollow, R. P., Cabezon, S., Faye, M., Tomita, A., Max, C., de Korte, M., Baudouin, C., Birkenbauma, D., Kallery, M., Anjos, S., Wu, Q., Chu, H., Slater, E., & Ortiz-Gil, A. (2021). The gateway science: A review of astronomy in the OECD school curricula, including China and South Africa. Research in Science Education, 51(4), 975–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09922-0

Sarapak, C., Jumpatam, J., Lunnoo, T., Kongngarm, N., Raso, S., & Kearns, K. (2025). Comparing 3D virtual labs and traditional labs: Impact on teacher training and student learning in physics education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(4), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i4.21115

Sarapak, C., Kong-In, P., Jindasri, P., Kakkaew, V., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Sumrandee, C., Sreejivungsa, K., Malingam, N., Krongsuk, S., & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Instrument design and validation for enhancing instructional design using the TPACK framework: A study in Surin Province. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(1), 10–24. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1170

Sarapak, C., Luengsiriwan, A., Kong-In, P., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Malingam, N., Hardthakwong, B., & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Conceptual understanding in fundamental and mechanical physics among pre-service physics teachers of Surindra Rajabhat University: A statistic and machine learning analysis. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(2), 80–97. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1171

Slater, E. V., Morris, J. E., & McKinnon, D. (2018). Astronomy alternative conceptions in pre-adolescent students in Western Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 40(17), 2158–2180. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1522014

Soga, M., Ohama, M., Ehara, Y., & Miwa, M. (2011). Real-world oriented mobile constellation learning environment using gaze pointing. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E94.D(4), 763–771. https://doi.org/10.1587/TRANSINF.E94.D.763

Sreejivungsa, K., Sarapak, C., Sumrandee, C., Kong-In, P., Jindasri, P., Kakkaew, V., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Malingam, N., Nakchat, O., Hardthakwong, B., & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Enhancing student understanding of basic physics concepts through mobile science experiments: A study at Thung Kula Pittayakom School, Surin Province. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(4), 233–246. https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/J_IAMSTEM/article/view/1169

Tian, K., Endo, M., Urata, M., Mouri, K., & Yasuda, T. (2014). Lunar observation support system using smartphone AR for astronomy education. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 8(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJIM.V8I1.3457

Türk, C., & Kalkan, H. (2015). The effect of planetariums on teaching specific astronomy concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9516-6