Submissions

Author Guidelines

Manuscript organization

The Intersecta Mind Journal Manuscript manuscripts generally contain the following sections, in this order:

• Title,
• Author list
• Affiliations
• Correspondence email(s)
• Additional footnotes (if any)
• Abstract
• Main text (which, in articles, should be separated into introduction, clear research objective or hypothesis, literature review, conceptual framework, materials and methods, results, and discussion)
• Appendices (if any)
• Supplemental information description, if any (note: this section should not include supplemental figures or tables; it should merely list how many and what types of files are included in the supplemental information)
• Acknowledgments
• Declaration of interests
• References
• Figure titles and legends
• Table titles and legends

All of these sections should be provided within one document.

All supplemental information (aside from very large tables of data or Excel files) should be compiled into a PDF and uploaded as a single file.

NOTE: Manuscripts that do not conform to the format guidelines may be returned for reformatting.

Intersecta Mind Journal Manuscript Organization Guidelines

1. Title

• Limit to three lines with a maximum of 54 characters each, conveying conceptual significance.

2. Author List

• Spell out names, no initials or titles.
• Numerical superscripts for affiliations and shared authorship roles.
• Comma precedes superscripts (e.g., John B. Smith,1 Jane C. Doe,2).

3. Affiliations

• Include department(s), institution, city, state, zip code, country, and email.

4. Correspondence

• "Correspondence" line as last footnote with email(s) of corresponding author(s).
• Non-superscript asterisks for corresponding authors.

5. Abstract

• Single paragraph, ≤250 words, conveying conceptual advance without citations.

6. Introduction

• The introduction serves to provide context, background, and a clear rationale for the research conducted. It should highlight the significance and relevance of the study.
• Succinct, no subheadings, providing background for a biological context.

7. Research Questions or Objectives or Hypothesis (if any)

• Clearly state the research question or hypothesis that the study aims to address. This sets the stage for the reader to understand the purpose and scope of the research.
• Clearly articulate the specific objectives or aims of the study. These should align with the research question and provide a roadmap for the reader to follow.
• Objectives, present the research objectives and hypotheses.

8. Literature Review

• Provide a brief and pertinent review of existing literature relevant to the research. Highlight gaps, controversies, or areas where your study contributes to the existing knowledge.
• This involves reviewing relevant literature and research, as well as establishing the theoretical framework for the study.

9. Conceptual Framework

• If applicable, present a conceptual framework that outlines the theoretical foundation guiding the research. This helps readers understand the theoretical underpinnings of the study.
• Significance of the Study, explain the importance of the research and how it advances the field of study. Discuss potential implications and applications of the findings.

10. Materials and Methods

• Sufficient detail for experiment replication.
• Outline the components such as research type, study population, sample groups, selection techniques, research tools, research procedures, data collection, and analysis methods.
• Include statistical methods description.

11. Results

• Presentation of Research Findings, Align the presentation of findings with the research objectives or hypotheses.

12. Discussion

• Discuss the results in accordance with the objectives, citing relevant research to support the discussed issues and content.
• Contextualize results, avoiding redundancy.
• Subheadings permitted.

13. Conclusion 

14. Appendices (if any)

• Detailed statistical analyses results.

15. Declaration of Interests

• Required for all papers, following Cell Press's policy.
• Specify competing interests or declare none.

16. Ethical Considerations

• Authors must conduct research with the highest standards of integrity, honesty, and transparency, following ethical guidelines and legal requirements.
• Authors involving human subjects must ensure informed consent is obtained, detailing the nature of the study, potential risks, and benefits. This includes ensuring the confidentiality and anonymity of participants.
• If the research involves animals, authors must adhere to ethical standards, providing evidence of proper care, humane treatment, and compliance with relevant regulations.
• Authors must obtain approval from the appropriate ethics review board or institutional review board and provide evidence of such approval in the manuscript.

17. Acknowledgments

• Acknowledge non-authors and funding sources.
• Proofread carefully.

18. Definition of Conflicts of Interest

• A conflict of interest arises when an author's financial, personal, or professional affiliations could potentially bias the interpretation, presentation, or publication of research findings.

19. References

• Follow provided style for articles, books, online references, computer programs, theses, and in-text citations.
• In-Text Citation and References Guidelines in APA 7 Format for Intersecta Mind Journal             

In-Text Citation:

Author(s) in Narrative:

When mentioning the author(s) in the narrative, include the publication year in parentheses.

• Example: According to Smith (2019),...

Author(s) in Parentheses:

If the author(s) is not mentioned in the narrative, include both the author(s) and publication year in parentheses.

• Example: (Smith, 2019).

Two Authors:

For works with two authors, include both authors' last names every time the citation occurs.

• Example: (Smith & Doe, 2020).

Three or More Authors:

For works with three or more authors, include the first author followed by "et al." from the first occurrence onward.

• Example: (Smith et al., 2021).

Group Author:

If the work has a group author, use the full name of the group as the author.

• Example: (American Psychological Association, 2018).

Multiple Works by the Same Author(s) and Year:

Distinguish between works by the same author(s) published in the same year by adding lowercase letters (a, b, c) after the year.

• Example: (Smith, 2020a; Smith, 2020b).

Secondary Source:

When citing a work discussed in another source, cite both the original work and the secondary source.

• Example: (Smith, 2018, as cited in Jones, 2019).

Quotations:

Include the page number(s) for direct quotations.

• Example: (Smith, 2017, p. 45).
• References:

Book:

• Author, A. A. (Year of publication). Title of work: Capital letter also for subtitle. Publisher.

Journal Article:

• Author, A. A. (Year of publication). Title of article. Title of Journal, volume number(issue number), page range. DOI or URL

Webpage with Author(s):

• Author, A. A. (Year, Month Day of publication). Title of webpage. Name of Website. URL

Webpage without Author(s):

• Title of webpage. (Year, Month Day of publication). Name of Website. URL

Edited Book:

• Editor, A. A. (Ed.). (Year of publication). Title of work: Capital letter also for subtitle. Publisher.

Chapter in an Edited Book:

• Author, A. A. (Year of publication). Title of chapter. In A. A. Editor (Ed.), Title of book: Capital letter also for subtitle (pp. page range). Publisher.

Report from a Government Agency:

• Author, A. A. (Year of publication). Title of report (Report No. xxx). Publisher.

Thesis/Dissertation:

• Author, A. A. (Year). Title of thesis/dissertation (Doctoral dissertation/Master's thesis). Name of Institution.

Online Video:

• Author, A. A. [Username]. (Year, Month Day of publication). Title of video. Platform. URL

In-Text Citation for Personal Communication:

• Personal communications, such as interviews, are cited in text but not included in the reference list.

In-Text Citation for Classical Works:

• For classical works, include the author's name and the year of the translation in parentheses.

Always refer to the APA Publication Manual (7th edition) for detailed and specific guidelines on in-text citation and reference formatting. Ensure consistency and accuracy in citing sources throughout the manuscript.

19. Figure Titles and Legends

• Separate section in the manuscript.
• Consecutive numbering (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.).
• No parenthetical information, reference citations, or footnotes in titles.
• Define measures for pooled data.

20. Tables

• After figure titles and legends, in the manuscript.
• Created using Microsoft Word table function.
• No tab or space delineation.
• No PDF format; provide as Word tables.

21. Organization of Supplemental Information

• Limited to specific types of data.
• Full-length articles: Limited to materials/methods related to supplemental items.
• Reports: Include complete methods section.

22. Supplemental Information Submission

• Single PDF for case reports, figures, tables, and references.
• No title or author list in the PDF.
• Ensure final PDF size <10 MB.
• Final version; scientific errors detected post-publication require correction.

23. Style Preferences for Supplemental Information

• Case reports titled "supplemental note: case reports."
• Figures titled Figure S1, Figure S2, etc.
• Tables titled Table S1, Table S2, etc.
• Use "supplemental" instead of "supplementary" in headings.

Research Ethics Guidelines for The Intersecta Mind Journal

Author Ethics:

1. Honesty and Integrity:

Authors must ensure the accuracy and truthfulness of their research findings by presenting data and results transparently.
Any form of data manipulation or fabrication is strictly prohibited.

2. Authorship and Acknowledgment:

All individuals who significantly contributed to the research must be listed as authors.
Proper acknowledgment of sources, funding, and collaborations is essential.

3. Plagiarism:

Authors must avoid plagiarism by appropriately citing and referencing sources.
Originality in research is highly valued, and any form of intellectual theft is unacceptable.

4. Ethical Treatment of Subjects:

Authors must prioritize the well-being, dignity, and rights of human subjects involved in their research.

Reviewer Ethics:

Informed consent must be obtained, and confidentiality should be maintained.
Reviewer Ethics:

1. Impartiality:

Reviewers must evaluate submissions objectively, without bias towards the author's identity, affiliation, or personal beliefs.
Constructive feedback should be provided to help authors improve their work.

2. Confidentiality:

Reviewers must treat the content of the manuscript as confidential information and refrain from discussing it without permission.
Any conflicts of interest that may compromise the review process must be disclosed.

3. Timeliness:

Reviewers should promptly complete their assigned reviews within the agreed-upon timeframe.
If unable to meet deadlines, reviewers are expected to communicate this to the editorial team.

4. Professionalism:

Reviewers must conduct themselves with professionalism, maintain respect in their critiques, and avoid personal attacks.

Constructive feedback should focus on the scientific merit of the work. Based on the Research Ethics Review Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects:

1. Informed Consent:

Researchers must obtain informed consent from all human subjects involved in the study.
The consent process should be comprehensive, ensuring participants understand the nature and purpose of the research.

2. Privacy and Confidentiality:

Researchers must implement measures to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants.
Data should be anonymized wherever possible, and access should be restricted to authorized personnel.

3. Beneficence and Non-maleficence:

Researchers must ensure that the potential benefits of the research outweigh any potential harm to participants.

Steps should be taken to minimize risks and protect vulnerable populations.

1. Ethical Reporting:

Researchers must accurately and transparently report their findings, including any unexpected outcomes or challenges encountered during the study.

Full disclosure of conflicts of interest is mandatory.
Adaptations for Social Sciences, Humanities, and Fine and Applied Arts:

2. Cultural Sensitivity:

Researchers must recognize and respect cultural nuances in the research context, adapting methodologies to suit the unique characteristics of social, cultural, artistic, and linguistic studies.

3. Community Engagement:

Involvement of the community in the research process is encouraged, ensuring their perspectives are considered and valued.

1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration:

Researchers are encouraged to collaborate across disciplines to enrich the understanding of complex issues in society, culture, art, and languages.

2. Creative and Artistic Expression:

Special consideration should be given to the ethical implications of research involving creative and artistic expression, recognizing the subjective nature of these endeavors.
These guidelines are designed to uphold the highest standards of ethics in research involving human subjects within the context of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Fine and Applied Arts. Researchers, authors, and reviewers associated with the Intersecta Minds Journal and Noble Education Co. Ltd.  are expected to adhere to these principles to ensure the integrity and ethical conduct of research activities.