About the Journal

Welcome to Intersecta Minds Journal, a distinguished platform of multidisciplinary at the forefront of intellectual exploration dedicated to the convergence of Social Science, Psychology, Arts and Humanities, Business, Management, and Education. Established with a vision to transcend disciplinary boundaries, our journal is a dynamic space that champions interdisciplinary dialogue, fosters academic excellence, and contributes to the global tapestry of knowledge.

Mission:

At Intersecta Minds Journal, our mission is to create a vibrant nexus where scholars, researchers, and practitioners converge to explore the multifaceted dimensions of the human experience. We strive to facilitate a rich exchange of ideas, nurture emerging talent, and contribute to the advancement of society through ethical and impactful scholarship.

Editor-in-Chief :

Dr. Sharma Khemraj

Noble Education Co., Ltd.

Email: imj.sshe@gmail.com  

 

ISSN: 3056-929X (Online)

 

Distinctive Features:

1. Interdisciplinary Nexus:

We take pride in being a catalyst for interdisciplinary research, recognizing the interconnected nature of human phenomena. Our platform welcomes contributions that transcend traditional academic silos, encouraging a holistic understanding of complex societal issues.

2. Global Perspectives:

Intersecta Minds Journal serves as a global hub for diverse perspectives. We actively seek submissions that reflect the rich tapestry of global cultures, providing a comprehensive view of the challenges, triumphs, and innovations shaping societies worldwide.

3. Innovative Scholarship:

Embracing the spirit of exploration, we prioritize cutting-edge research, emerging trends, and innovative methodologies. Our commitment to staying at the forefront of academic discourse ensures that our readers are exposed to the latest developments in Social Science, Arts, and Humanities.

4. Engaging Dialogue:

Beyond being a repository of knowledge, Intersecta Minds Journal is a dynamic forum for scholarly dialogue. We foster an environment where authors and readers can engage in meaningful conversations, promoting a culture of collaboration and exchange.

 5. Support for Emerging Scholars:

As part of our commitment to nurturing the next generation of thinkers, we actively encourage submissions from emerging scholars and graduate students. We believe in providing a supportive platform for early-career academics to showcase their work and contribute to the academic community.

 Our Commitment:

1. Excellence in Publication:

Intersecta Minds Journal upholds rigorous standards of peer review, ensuring that published content meets the highest levels of academic excellence. Our commitment to quality extends to every facet of the publication process.

 2. Ethical Scholarship:

We are unwavering in our commitment to upholding the highest ethical standards in research and publication. Authors, reviewers, and editors alike adhere to principles of integrity, transparency, and responsible scholarship.

 3. Community Building:

Beyond the pages of our journal, we aim to build a global community of intellectuals. Intersecta Minds Journal serves as a catalyst for forging connections, fostering collaborations, and establishing a network of scholars committed to advancing knowledge.

Country: Thailand

Language: English

Website: https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IMJ

Subject Codes: Social Sciences; Arts and Humanities; Business; Management; Education

Publisher: Noble Education Co., Ltd.

Publication Frequency:  Scheduled to publish 3 issues per year.

Issue 1 January - April

Issue 2 May - August

Issue 3 September - December

 

Payment of publication fees: 

Publication fees: Thai Rate 5000 Bath or Equle (Rate exchange in the day of paying by USDollar)

Bank: KASIKORNBANK

Account Name: NOBLE EDUCATION

Account No.: 172-8-80599-0

After making the payment, kindly submit your payment receipt or invoice to the Intersecta Mind Journal system. As the editor of Intersecta Mind Journal, this documentation is necessary for record-keeping and verification purposes.

 

Peer Review Process at Intersecta Minds Journal

Intersecta Minds Journal, outline our peer review process, a critical aspect of ensuring the quality and integrity of the research we publish. Our process can be summarized in 10 key steps, though variations may exist among different journals.

Intersecta Minds Journal is a Peer-Reviewed Journals and Full Open Access journal, published via publisher platforms, in full open access journals by 3 peer reviewers for every article.

Peer Review Process

1. Submission of Paper: Submit Manuscript

Authors submit their work via Scholar One Manuscripts or, in some cases, through email.

2.Editorial Office Assessment: Initial Screening

The Editorial Office ensures adherence to the journal’s Author Guidelines, without evaluating the paper's quality at this stage.

3. Appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief (EIC): Manuscript Accepted or Manuscript Rejected

The Editor-in-Chief evaluates the paper for scope, originality, and merits. Rejection may occur at this stage.

4. EIC Assigns an Associate Editor (AE): Peer-review from the initial screening outcome

If applicable, an Associate Editor is assigned to handle the peer review process.

5. Invitation to Reviewers: Revision Required

The handling editor invites individuals believed to be suitable reviewers. Additional invitations are issued as needed until the required number is secured.

6. Response to Invitations: Sent to reviewers

Potential reviewers assess their expertise, conflicts, and availability before accepting or declining. Suggestions for alternative reviewers are appreciated.

7. Review is Conducted: Language editing by the author and further review needed

Reviewers dedicate time to multiple readings, forming initial impressions and conducting detailed point-by-point reviews. Recommendations (e.g., revise, accept, or reject) are submitted to the journal.

8. Journal Evaluates the Reviews: Reviews assessed by editor

The handling editor considers all reviews. If divergent opinions exist, an additional reviewer may be consulted for an extra opinion.

9. The Decision is Communicated: Some Manuscript Accepted or Menuscript Rejected

The editor communicates the decision to the author, including relevant reviewer comments. Anonymity is maintained per the journal’s peer review model.

10. Next Steps: Production and Publication

If accepted, the paper proceeds to production and publication.

If rejected or requiring revision, the handling editor provides constructive comments from reviewers to aid improvement. Reviewers are informed of the review outcome. If revisions are sought, a new version is expected, unless reviewers opt out of further participation.

We appreciate the dedication of our reviewers and the commitment of authors to scholarly excellence.

Research Ethics Guidelines for The Intersecta Mind Journal

 

Author Ethics:

1. Honesty and Integrity

Authors must ensure the accuracy and truthfulness of their research findings by presenting data and results transparently.
Any form of data manipulation or fabrication is strictly prohibited.

2. Authorship and Acknowledgment

All individuals who significantly contributed to the research must be listed as authors.
Proper acknowledgment of sources, funding, and collaborations is essential.

3. Plagiarism

Authors must avoid plagiarism by appropriately citing and referencing sources.
Originality in research is highly valued, and any form of intellectual theft is unacceptable.

4. Ethical Treatment of Subjects

Authors must prioritize the well-being, dignity, and rights of human subjects involved in their research.

Reviewer Ethics:

Informed consent must be obtained, and confidentiality should be maintained.
Reviewer Ethics:

1. Impartiality

Reviewers must evaluate submissions objectively, without bias towards the author's identity, affiliation, or personal beliefs.
Constructive feedback should be provided to help authors improve their work.

2. Confidentiality

Reviewers must treat the content of the manuscript as confidential information and refrain from discussing it without permission.
Any conflicts of interest that may compromise the review process must be disclosed.

3. Timeliness

Reviewers should promptly complete their assigned reviews within the agreed-upon timeframe.
If unable to meet deadlines, reviewers are expected to communicate this to the editorial team.

4. Professionalism

Reviewers must conduct themselves with professionalism, maintain respect in their critiques, and avoid personal attacks.

Constructive feedback should focus on the scientific merit of the work. Based on the Research Ethics Review Committee for Research Involving Human Subjects:

1. Informed Consent

Researchers must obtain informed consent from all human subjects involved in the study.
The consent process should be comprehensive, ensuring participants understand the nature and purpose of the research.

2. Privacy and Confidentiality

Researchers must implement measures to protect the privacy and confidentiality of participants.
Data should be anonymized wherever possible, and access should be restricted to authorized personnel.

3. Beneficence and Non-maleficence

Researchers must ensure that the potential benefits of the research outweigh any potential harm to participants.

Steps should be taken to minimize risks and protect vulnerable populations.

1. Ethical Reporting

Researchers must accurately and transparently report their findings, including any unexpected outcomes or challenges encountered during the study. Full disclosure of conflicts of interest is mandatory.
Adaptations for Social Sciences, Humanities, and Fine and Applied Arts:

2. Cultural Sensitivity

Researchers must recognize and respect cultural nuances in the research context, adapting methodologies to suit the unique characteristics of social, cultural, artistic, and linguistic studies.

3. Community Engagement

Involvement of the community in the research process is encouraged, ensuring their perspectives are considered and valued.

1. Interdisciplinary Collaboration

Researchers are encouraged to collaborate across disciplines to enrich the understanding of complex issues in society, culture, art, and languages.

2. Creative and Artistic Expression

Special consideration should be given to the ethical implications of research involving creative and artistic expression, recognizing the subjective nature of these endeavors.
These guidelines are designed to uphold the highest standards of ethics in research involving human subjects within the context of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Fine and Applied Arts. Researchers, authors, and reviewers associated with the Intersecta Minds Journal and Noble Education Co. Ltd.  are expected to adhere to these principles to ensure the integrity and ethical conduct of research activities.