The Relationship of Conceptual Understanding and Motivation of Grade 7 Learners: Basis for Strategic Interventions on Force, Motion, and Energy
Main Article Content
Abstract
Physics education plays a crucial role in developing critical thinking, problem-solving skills, and scientific literacy. However, Grade 7 learners frequently encounter difficulties in grasping fundamental physics concepts. This study investigated the level of conceptual understanding of learners and the relationships between level of motivation and the level of conceptual understanding of force, motion, and energy and five motivational factors (intrinsic, self-efficacy, self-determination, grade, and career) among Grade 7 learners in selected private schools in the Philippines. Employing a quantitative approach, a thirty (30) -item assessment tool, aligned with the MATATAG Curriculum, was developed and validated. A pilot test was administered to One Hundred Twenty (120) learners. The validated instrument was administered to forty (40) participants. Findings revealed significant learning gaps in conceptual understanding, with only one student (2.5%) achieving the passing standard. Distance-time graphs, followed by heat transfer, were identified as the most challenging topics. Spearman’s rank correlation analysis revealed moderately positive relationships between conceptual understanding and intrinsic motivation (ρ = .784, p < .001), grade motivation (ρ = .703, p < .001), and career motivation (ρ = .784, p < .001). A statistically significant, but weaker, positive relationship was found between conceptual understanding and self-determination (ρ = .422, p = .007). In contrast, the relationship between self-efficacy and conceptual understanding was not statistically significant (ρ = .299, p = .061). These results highlight the need for possible instructional interventions addressing specific conceptual difficulties and suggest that fostering intrinsic, grade, and career motivation may be beneficial. The study recommends incorporating strategies that enhance higher-order thinking skills, connect learning to real-world applications and career paths, and provide targeted support in challenging topics to improve both motivation and conceptual understanding in physics.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: Complete Edition. New York: Longman.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Brothen, T. (2012). Time Limits on Tests: Updating the 1-Minute Rule. Teaching of Psychology. 39. 288-292. 10.1177/0098628312456630.
Camarao, M. K. G., & Nava, F. J. G. (2017). High School Students’ Difficulties in Physics. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320980117_
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. New York: Plenum Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Department of Education (2024). MATATAG Curriculum overview. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph
Department of Education Memorandum No. 160 s. 2012. (2012). Maximizing Utilization Of The National Achievement Test (Nat) Results To Raise the Achievement Levels In Low Performing Schools. Retrieved from: https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/DM_s2012_160.pdf
Fitzallen, N. et al. (2016) Year 3 students’ conceptions of heat transfer., Australian Association for Research in Education. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED591867 (Accessed: 21 December 2024).
Glynn, S. M., Brickman, P., Armstrong, N. & Taasoobshirazi, G. (2011). Science Motivation Questionnaire II: Validation with Science Majors and Nonscience Majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 48. 1159 - 1176. 10.1002/tea.20442.
Gülen, S. (2019). The effect of STEM education roles on the solution of daily life problems. Participatory Educational Research. 6. 37-50. 10.17275/per.19.11.6.2.
Mathai, S., Krishnan, P., & Sreevalsan-Nair, J. (2024). Understanding Graphical Literacy Using School Students’ Comprehension Strategies. Contemporary Education Dialogue, 22(1), 40-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/09731849241242855
National Research Council (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For States, By States. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. DOI:10.17226/18290
Orleans, A. V. (2020). Addressing challenges in Philippine science education through innovative teaching strategies. International Journal of Science Education, 42(5), 573–592. DOI: 10.48028/iiprds/ijirsssmt.v9.i1.10
Quiao, M. A., Matutes, K. C., Won, M. E., & Nabua, E. (2024). Development and Validation of an Assessment Tool for Senior High School Physical Chemistry. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 1(5): 225 – 234
Richter, R., Tipold, A., & Schaper, E. (2024). Identification of parameters for electronic distance examinations. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2024.1385681
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.68
Wangchuk, D., Wangdi, D., Tshomo, S., & Zangmo, J. (2023). Exploring Students’ Perceived Difficulties of Learning Physics. Educational Innovation and Practice. 6. 10.17102/eip.6.2023.03.