Developing the Management Guidelines for Evaluation System of Kindergarten Teachers of Chengdu Fujin Kindergarten, China

Wu Juan; Nithipattara Balsiri

ผู้แต่ง

Wu Juan
Nithipattara Balsiri -

คำสำคัญ:

Management Guidelines, Evaluation System, Kindergarten Teacher

บทคัดย่อ

The objective of this research was to develop management guidelines of evaluation system of kindergarten teachers of Chengdu Fujin Kindergarten, China. The samples in this research project were divided into 2 groups; namely 1) 36 teachers and 2) 6 administrators The research instrument used in this study was rating scale questionnaire, including 30 questions for teachers and 30 questions for administrators. The collected data and information were analyzed, interpreted, and presented in the form of frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The research finding indicated that 1) problems of the evaluation method of teachers were at high level; 1.1) Our current teacher evaluation system is designed to encourage teachers to grow and develop better. 1.2) Teachers have a full voice and participation in the process of teacher evaluation. 1.3) Kindergartens pay attention to parental participation in the process of teacher evaluation. 1.4) Kindergarten teacher evaluation pays special attention to teachers' ethics. 1.5) The evaluation of kindergarten teachers pays special attention to their performance. 1.6) Kindergarten teacher evaluation pays special attention to the ability of teachers. 2) management guidelines of evaluation system of kindergarten teachers consisted of 3 parts; 2.1) The School Management 2.2) Evaluation System of Kindergarten Teachers 2.3) The Current Situations of Management Guidelines for Evaluation System of Kindergarten Teachers.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Ahn, T. (2013). The missing link: Estimating the impact of incentives of teacher effort and instruction effectiveness using teacher accountability legislation data. Journal of Human Capital, 7(3), 230-273.

Attenborough, K. (2007). ‘Soft Systems in a Hardening World: Evaluating Urban Regeneration’. In B, Williams and I. Imam (Eds), Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology (pp. 75–89). Point Reyes: Edge Press of Inverness.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika. 16(3), 297–334.

Feng, L. (2021). Exploration of Kindergarten Curriculum Quality Evaluation Index System. Advances in Education, 11, 906.

Guo L. (2018). Research on the evaluation system of Shanghai University PE teachers based on education and teaching. Science and Education Guide (electronic edition), (2), 207-208.

Hill, H. C., & Grossman, P. (2013). Learning from teacher observations: Challenges and opportunities posed by new teacher evaluation systems. Harvard Educational Review, 83(2), 371-384.

Huang, C. W. (2022). The dilemma and reason of the first implementation of learning area teaching by the novice teacher guard. Early Childhood Education Journal, (33), 71-90.

Krejcie, R. V., & D. W. Morgan. (1970). “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities”. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607 – 610.

Leeuw, F. L., & Furubo, J. E. (2008). Evaluation systems: What are they and why study them. Evaluation, 14(2), 157-169.

Looney, J. (2011). Developing high-quality teachers: Teacher evaluation for improvement. European Journal of Education, 46(4), 440-455.

McGreal, T. L. (1983). Successful teacher evaluation. Publications, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Publishing house.

Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timerperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art-- teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness & School Improvement, 25(2), 231-256.

O'Brien, K. (2014). An investigation of teacher evaluation systems and how they can be transformed to improve teaching and learning: A change leadership plan (Doctoral dissertation, National Louis University). National Louis University Digital Commons, Chicago, TL, USA.

Pan, Y. Wang, Y. & Yang, X. (2018). The characteristics and effects of kindergarten teacher performance evaluation —— Based on the perspective of teacher perception. Preschool education research, (5), 3-11

Papay, J. P. (2012). Refocusing the debate: Assessing the purposes and tools of teacher evaluation. Harvard Educational Review, 82(1), 123-141.

Srisa-ard, B. (2002). Basic Research. Bangkok: Suveeriyasarn.

Stewart, V. (2011). Improving teacher quality around the world: The international summit on the teaching profession. Asia Society.

Williams, B., & Imam, I. (2007). Systems Concepts in Evaluation: An Expert Anthology. Point Reyes: EdgePress of Inverness.

Williams, K., & Hebert, D. (2020). Teacher Evaluation Systems: A Literature Review on Issues and Impact. Research Issues in Contemporary Education, 5(1), 42-50.

Wise, A. E., Darling-Hammond, L., McLaughlin, M. W., & Bernstein, H. T. (1985). Teacher evaluation: A study of effective practices. The elementary school journal, 86 (1), 61-121.