The Exercise of Discretion in Adjudicating Disputes Related to Neglect of Duty Required by Law
คำสำคัญ:
Administrative Discretion, Neglect of Statutory Duty, Judicial Review in Administrative Law, Accountability of Public Officialsบทคัดย่อ
The exercise of discretion in adjudicating disputes related to neglect of duty required by law was an analysis of the neglect of duty of government officials and its effects on people’s rights and well-being. The study focused on the importance of exercising suitable discretion in justice process, developing specific standards of conduct, and training government officials about law and ethics to prevent the abuse of power. Moreover, guidelines for solving the neglect of duty were suggested that included developing clear regulations, setting appropriate penalties, and creating a mechanism for continuous monitoring the performance of duty to ensure transparency and accountability in public service. These measures will promote confidence in judicial processes as well as protect people’s rights efficiently.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Adhayanto, O., et al. (2018). Controlling administrative discretion: The role of law. Juridica International (JURIDICA), 14(3), 45–55.
Black, H. C. (1968). Black’s law dictionary (4th ed.). West Publishing Co.
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s empire. Harvard University Press. https://www.filosoficas.unam.mx/~cruzparc/empire.pdf
Fukuyama, F. (2011). The origins of political order: From prehuman times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Galligan, D. J. (1992). Law in modern society. Oxford University Press.
Garner, B. A. (Ed.). (2004). Black’s law dictionary (8th ed.). Thomson West.
Holmes, V., & Bartlett, F. (2003). Parker and Evans’s inside lawyers’ ethics (4th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
James, G. D. (1990). Discretionary powers: A legal study of official discretion. Oxford University Press. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/discretionary-powers-9780198256526
Moonma, U. (2015). Legal problems involving the illegality of administrative order that is explicit and serious error. Journal of Law, Naresuan University, 8(1), 114–139.
Namata, K. (2018). Discretion to consider serious damage. Journal of Graduate MCU Khon Kaen Campus, 5(2), 65–80.
Punumpai, K. (2022). Judicial review of decisions of the trademarks board (Master’s thesis, Thammasat University, Thailand).
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Harvard University Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice (Rev. ed.). Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. https://giuseppecapograssi.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/rawls99.pdf
Singkaneti, B. (2024). Public sphere and the constructing of strong communities. International Journal of Sociologies and Anthropologies Science Review, 4(2), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.60027/ijsasr.2024.4484
Soraat, N. (2021). Right of retention in execution of civil judgements and bankruptcy proceedings: A comparative study of Thai and Japanese laws. Journal of Law, Naresuan University, 14(2), 223–254.
Techawanakorn, Y. (2023). The control of usage of discretionary power by administrative court of Thailand. Journal of Multidisciplinary Academic Research and Development, 5(4), 1–22.
Thapa, I. (2020, December). Administrative law: Concept, definition, nature, scope and principle and its sources. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.28027.95526
Tyran, J. R., & Feld, L. P. (2001). Why people obey the law: Experimental evidence from the provision of public goods. Center for Economic Studies and ifo Institute (CESifo). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/4931107_Why_People_Obey_the_Law_Experimental_Evidence_from_the_Provision_of_Public_Goods
Weber, M. (1864–1920). Weber and public administration today. The Estonian Journal of Administrative Culture and Digital Governance, 21(1), 86–91.
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
หมวดหมู่
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2026 วารสารวิชาการสหศาสตร์ศึกษา
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความนี้ได้รับการเผยแพร่ภายใต้สัญญาอนุญาต Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ซึ่งอนุญาตให้ผู้อื่นสามารถแชร์บทความได้โดยให้เครดิตผู้เขียนและห้ามนำไปใช้เพื่อการค้าหรือดัดแปลง หากต้องการใช้งานซ้ำในลักษณะอื่น ๆ หรือการเผยแพร่ซ้ำ จำเป็นต้องได้รับอนุญาตจากวารสาร
