Privacy Statement

Author's Responsibilities:

1. Authors must certify that the submitted article is original, not previously published elsewhere, not under consideration by any other journal, and does not duplicate or infringe on the copyright of other authors' work.

2. Articles with multiple authors must obtain the consent of all co-authors.

3. Authors must carefully review the author guidelines and write the article according to the journal's specified format.

4. If the work of others is used in the submitted article, the author must provide in-text citations and a reference list according to the journal's format.

5. If the author is a student, the submitted article must include the name of their advisor as one of the co-authors.

6. All content appearing in the submitted article is the sole responsibility of the author. The author accepts sole responsibility for any copyright infringement.

Editor's Responsibilities:

1. Editors must assess the quality of the article before the evaluation process, without bias in any aspect.

2. Editors must not consider any personal interests that may arise or be gained. From the acceptance of an article into the journal's review process:

3. Throughout the article review process, the editor must maintain confidentiality of the review information and not disclose it to unrelated individuals, which could lead to damage to the author and the journal.

4. If plagiarism is detected during the review process, the editor must immediately stop the review process and contact the original author for written clarification. This information will then be used by the editor in deciding whether to accept or reject the article for publication.

Duties of Reviewers

1. Throughout the article review process, reviewers must maintain confidentiality of the review information and not disclose it to unrelated individuals, which could lead to damage to the author and the journal.

2. If a reviewer receives an article in which they may have a direct or indirect interest, they must immediately inform the editor.

3. Reviewers should review articles within the timeframe specified by the journal.

4. Reviewers should review articles with their knowledge and expertise to ensure that the reviewed article is of academic quality, and that the author can use the feedback received to revise the article for completeness and contribute to useful knowledge.

5. Reviewers should review articles in their area of ​​expertise. 5. Articles will be evaluated in terms of academic quality, and personal opinions, likes, or dislikes will not be used in judging the article.

6. If a reviewer finds that any part of an article may be duplicated in the work of another person, the reviewer must notify the editor immediately.