Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Arduino-Based Inquiry Activities for Friction and Newton’s Second Law in Pre-Service Physics Teacher Education
Main Article Content
Abstract
Persistent misconceptions concerning friction and Newton’s second law remain a challenge in physics education, particularly among pre-service physics teachers. This study aimed to develop, evaluate, and preliminarily examine Arduino-based inquiry learning activities designed to connect abstract physics concepts with experimental evidence. A mixed-methods developmental approach based on the ADDIE model and a one-group pretest–posttest design was employed. The developed package consisted of four interconnected learning units organized around two core Arduino-based experiments, together with instructional guides, worksheets, and experimental kits. Three experts evaluated the package, which was subsequently implemented with 30 pre-service physics teachers. Quantitative data were collected using a 30-item conceptual understanding test, while qualitative data were obtained from observations, reflective journals, and interviews. Expert evaluation indicated that the activities were of the highest overall quality (M = 4.79, SD = 0.17), with an average Index of Item–Objective Congruence of 0.98. Participants’ mean conceptual understanding score increased from 8.80 out of 30 (29.33%) on the pretest to 23.40 (78.00%) on the immediate posttest, t(29) = −24.98, p < .001. The class-average normalized gain was 0.69, indicating a medium gain. Qualitative findings suggested that real-time data collection and graph-based analysis helped participants connect observable motion with relationships among force, mass, friction, and acceleration. However, difficulties distinguishing static and kinetic friction persisted. These findings provide preliminary evidence supporting Arduino-based inquiry activities for physics teacher education.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Addido, J., Borowczak, A. C., & Walwema, G. B. (2023). Teaching Newtonian physics with LEGO EV3 robots: An integrated STEM approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(6), em2280. https://doi.org/10.29333/EJMSTE/13232
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Chitolina, D., & Santos, P. J. S. dos. (2024). Impacto do uso do Arduino sobre a motivação estudantil: Resultados de uma intervenção didático-pedagógica no ensino da Física. RENOTE, 22(1), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-1916.141545
Çoban, A., & Salar, R. (2023). Analyzing position, velocity and acceleration graphs using Arduino. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 19(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v19i1.32246
Çoban, A., & Erol, M. (2022). STEM Education of Kinematics and Dynamics Using Arduino. The Physics Teacher, 60(4), 289–291. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0009994
Çoban, A., & Boyaci, S. (2020). The calculation of kinetic and static friction coefficient and friction graph analysis using Arduino. Physics Education, 56(1), 013003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ABC07C
Dat, N. D., Bien, N. Van, Khuyen, N. T. T., Ha, N. T. V., An, H. T. T. & Anh, N. T. P. (2024). Arduino-Based Experiments: Leveraging Engineering Design and Scientific Inquiry in STEM Lessons. International Journal of STEM Education for Sustainability, 4(1), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.53889/IJSES.V4I1.317
Farrar, M. J. (2021). ArduinoTM microprocessors as a platform for modeling framework labs. American Journal of Physics, 89(6), 596–602. https://doi.org/10.1119/10.0004856
Ferrarelli, P., & Iocchi, L. (2021). Learning Newtonian Physics through Programming Robot Experiments. Technology, Knowledge and Learning 2021 26:4, 26(4), 789–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10758-021-09508-3
Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: An introduction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Ha, S., & Kim, M. (2020). Challenges of designing and carrying out laboratory experiments about Newton’s second law. Science & Education 2020 29:5, 29(5), 1389–1416. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11191-020-00155-1
Handayani, W., & Setya, W. (2022). Preservice physics teachers’ laboratory project design: Arduino-based creativity. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2468, 020012. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0102773
Lee, E. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Arduino-Based Education in Korean Primary and Secondary Schools in Engineering Education. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1503–1512. https://doi.org/10.12973/EU-JER.9.4.1503
Sarapak, C., Jumpatam, J., Lunnoo, T., Kongngarm, N., Raso, S., & Kearns, K. (2025a). Comparing 3D virtual labs and traditional labs: Impact on teacher training and student learning in physics education. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 14(4), 772–783. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v14i4.21115
Sarapak, C., Kong-In, P., Jindasri, P., Kakkaew, V., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Sumrandee, C., Sreejivungsa, K., Malingam, N., Krongsuk, S., & Lunnoo, T. (2025b). Instrument design and validation for enhancing instructional design using the TPACK framework: A study in Surin Province. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(1), 10–24.
Sarapak, C., Luengsiriwan, A., Kong-In, P., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Malingam, N., Hardthakwong, B., & Lunnoo, T. (2025c). Conceptual understanding in fundamental and mechanical physics among pre-service physics teachers of Surindra Rajabhat University: A statistic and machine learning analysis. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(2), 80–97.
Schnider, D., & Hömöstrei, M. (2023). The influence of Arduino-based student experimentation on the development of students’ skills and competences. In J. Borg Marks & P. Galea (Eds.), Physics teacher education: More about what matters (pp. 185–198). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44312-1_14
Sreejivungsa, K., Sarapak, C., Sumrandee, C., Kong-In, P., Jindasri, P., Kakkeaw, V., Wattanakornsiri, A., Yoomark, J., Malingam, N., Nakchat, O., Hardthakwong, B., & Lunnoo, T. (2025). Enhancing student understanding of basic physics concepts through mobile science experiments: A study at Thung Kula Pittayakom School, Surin Province. Journal of Innovation, Advancement, and Methodology in STEM Education, 2(4), 233–246.