Investigating Students' Misconceptions in Learning Magnetic Field and Force for Cambodian High Schools

Main Article Content

Samnang Khek

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students’ misconceptions to examine the difficulties students face in learning about magnetic fields and forces in Cambodian high schools. Methodology included both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data were collected from 1,685 high school students who completed a 30-item multiple-choice diagnostic test. Qualitative data was obtained through semi-structured interviews with 30 selected students. The results revealed several recurring misconceptions, including the misapplication of the Right-Hand Rule (RHR), difficulty in translating between two-dimensional diagrams and three-dimensional models, confusion with vector symbols, misinterpretation of magnetic poles, and a misconception of the magnetic force between current-carrying wires. There are five patterns of misconception, including misapplication of the RHR, symbol confusion, misconceptions about magnetic poles, misinterpretation from 2D to 3D representations, and misconceptions concerning magnetic forces between current-carrying wires. In the Cambodian context, a significant number of students had misconceptions about converting and understanding the spatial relationship between the 2D representation and the actual 3D orientation of magnetic fields and forces. Most students struggle with interpreting 2D to 3D diagrams; they are challenged by rotating the object, visualizing orientation changes when the current direction or magnetic field direction changes, interpreting its position from different views, and misapplication of RHR. The implications of this study suggest that instructional strategies should place more emphasis on helping students translate between 2D diagrams and 3D models, supported by explicit training in applying the Right-Hand Rule. Incorporating interactive tools, hands-on activities, and visualization strategies into curriculum design could reduce misconceptions and improve students’ conceptual understanding of magnetic fields and forces. For further study, the findings emphasized the need to develop students’ ability to visualize 3D representations from 2D diagrams and apply RHR through hands-on activities to enhance conceptual understanding in physics.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Chandralekha, S., & Jing, L. (2012). MCS-v1-en SPIRALING.pdf (pp. 1–15). PhysPort.org. https://www.physport.org

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 671–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690305016

Fatmaryanti, S. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Ashadi. (2017a). Attainment of students’ conception in magnetic fields by using of direct observation and symbolic language ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 909, 012058. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/909/1/012058

Fatmaryanti, S. D., Suparmi, Sarwanto, & Ashadi. (2017b). Student representation of magnetic field concepts in learning by guided inquiry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 795, 012059. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/795/1/012059

Gagnier, K. M., Atit, K., Ormand, C. J., & Shipley, T. F. (2017). Comprehending 3D Diagrams: Sketching to Support Spatial Reasoning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12233

Galili, I. (1995). Mechanics background influences students’ conceptions in electromagnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 17(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170308

González, J. D., Escobar, J. H., Sánchez, H., Hoz, J. D. L., & Beltrán, J. R. (2017). 2D and 3D virtual interactive laboratories of physics on Unity platform. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 935, 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/935/1/012069

Hau, R. R. H., Marwoto, P., & Putra, N. M. D. (2018). Pattern of mathematic representation ability in magnetic electricity problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983, 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012015

Ho, C.-H., Eastman, C., & Catrambone, R. (2006). An investigation of 2D and 3D spatial and mathematical abilities. Design Studies, 27(4), 505–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2005.11.007

Jelicic, K., Planinic, M., & Planinsic, G. (2017). Analyzing high school students’ reasoning about electromagnetic induction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(1), 010112. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010112

Kustusch, M. B. (2016). Assessing the impact of representational and contextual problem features on student use of right-hand rules. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(1), 010102. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.010102

Leng, P., Khieng S., Chhem R., & Smith, G. (2021). De-framing STEM discourses in Cambodia. CDRI Working Paper Series No. 127. Cambodia Development Resource Institute.

https://cdri.org.kh/storage/pdf/WP127E_DeframingSTEM_1622794628.pdf?

Maloney, D. P., O’Kuma, T. L., Hieggelke, C. J., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2001). Surveying students’ conceptual knowledge of electricity and magnetism. American Journal of Physics, 69(S1), S12–S23. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1371296

MISTI. (2021). Cambodia's Science, Technology, and Innovation Roadmap 2030.

MoEYS. (2012). Physics textbook for Grade 12. Department of Curriculum Development.

MoEYS. (2017). Science textbook for Grade 9. Department of Curriculum Development.

MoEYS. (2018). The revised Physics Syllabus for Upper Secondary Education: (Khmer version). Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport

MOEYS. (2019). Results of Grade 11 Student Achievement from the National Assessment in 2018.

MoEYS. (2023). Grade 8 National Learning Assessment Academic Year: 2021-2022.

MoEYS. (2024). EDUCATION STRATEGIC PLAN 2024-2028.

MoEYS. (2025). Strategic Plan for Teacher Education Reform in Cambodia 2024-2030.

National Council for Science and Technology. (2019). Science, Technology, and Innovation 2020-2030 kh.

Özdemir, E., & Coramik, M. (2018). Reasons of Student Difficulties with Right-Hand Rules in Electromagnetism. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(2), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/18.17.320

Ramful, A., Maesuri Patahuddin, S., Moheeput, K., & Johar, R. (2023). The spatial requirements of the left-hand rule: A novel instrument for assessing the coordination of egocentric and allocentric frames of reference. International Journal of Science Education, 45(8), 661–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2172625

Sağlam, M., & Millar, R. (2006). Upper High School Students’ Understanding of Electromagnetism. International Journal of Science Education, 28(5), 543–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339613

Scaife, T. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2010). Student understanding of the direction of the magnetic force on a charged particle. American Journal of Physics, 78(8), 869–876. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3386587

Sorby, S. A. (2009). Educational Research in Developing 3‐D Spatial Skills for Engineering Students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802595839

St. John, M., Cowen, M. B., Smallman, H. S., & Oonk, H. M. (2001). The Use of 2D and 3D Displays for Shape-Understanding versus Relative-Position Tasks. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775992534

Vann, P. (2023). STEM Education in Cambodia: Progress and Challenges. Cambodian Education Forum. https://cambodianeducationforum.com