Using Real-Time Simulations in Teaching Typhoon and its Risks
Main Article Content
Abstract
Education is shifting towards modern approaches, particularly through integrating digital resources and STEM in the classroom. One key innovation in science education is simulation tools, which offer interactive and engaging ways to teach complex concepts. This study presents the development of a learning packet on typhoons and their associated risks, incorporating real-time simulation tools such as Project NOAH and Zoom Earth. These tools allow learners to visualize typhoon movements, interpret hazard data, and connect science concepts with real-life applications. Guided by the Successive Approximation Model (SAM), an iterative design process was followed to refine the learning materials through expert feedback continuously. A needs assessment among 25 in-service science teachers identified commonly used instructional materials—videos, PowerPoint presentations, and laboratory activities—with limitations in promoting deep learning. To address these gaps, two simulation-based learning activities were created and validated by 34 pre-service and five in-service teachers. Evaluation results showed strong agreement on the instructional design, clarity, and overall effectiveness of the learning packet, with ratings ranging from 3.71 to 3.96. Integrating real-time simulation tools supports STEM learning by making abstract meteorological processes more tangible and engaging. Moreover, this work aligns with SDG 4 (Quality Education) and SDG 13 (Climate Action) by fostering student disaster preparedness and scientific understanding, thereby contributing to global goals. This study demonstrates that simulation-driven instructional materials can enhance both conceptual understanding and climate resilience in science education.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abah, J. A. (2020). An appeal in the case involving conventional teaching: Emphasizing the transformation to enhanced conventional teaching. Educational Review (VER). HAL Science. https://hal.science/
Allen, M. W. (2012). Leaving ADDIE for SAM: An Agile Model for Developing the Best Learning Experiences. ASTD Press.
Ambag, R. (2018). Teaching science in the Philippines: Why (and how) we can do better. FlipScience - Top Philippine Science News and Features for the Inquisitive Filipino. Retrieved December 5, 2019, from https://www.flipscience.ph/news/features-news/features/teaching-science-philippines
Balansag, S. (2019). Improvement of the teaching style: From traditional teacher-centered to student-centered teaching style. Bod Third Party Titles
Becker, K., & Parker, J.R. (2009). A simulation primer. In Gibson, D. and Baek, Y. (Eds), Digital Simulations for Improving Education: Learning Through Artificial Teaching Environments. Hershey, PA: IGI Global
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does. McGraw-Hill Education. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Bruner, J. S. (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31(1), 21–32.
Brame CJ (2016). Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 15(4): es6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125
Chen, S., & Li, W. (2024). A Review of Typhoon Inner Core Characteristics and Their Relationship with Intensity Changes. Atmosphere, 15(12), 1522. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos15121522
Juan, A. A., Loch, B., Daradoumis, T., & Ventura, S. (2017). Games and simulation in higher education. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ., 14, 37.
Lederman, N. G., & Lederman, J. S. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In Handbook of research on science education, volume II (pp. 614-634). Routledge.
Moore, E. B., Chamberlain, J. M., Parson, R., & Perkins, K. K. (2013). PhET interactive simulations: Transformative tools for learning chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 90(4), 507–513. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed300009w
Perkins, K. K., Moore, E., & Chasteen, S. V. (2015). Examining the use of PhET interactive simulations in US college and high school classrooms. 1, 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2014.pr.048
Phoenix Union High School District. (1974). The ABC's of learning packets. ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED100299
Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2017). Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology. Pearson.
Santos, G. D. C. (2021). 2020 tropical cyclones in the Philippines: A review. College of Education, Nueva Ecija University of Science and Technology. Retrieved from https://pdf.sciencedirectassets.com
Soberano, R. D., & Matias, C. L. V. (2024, May). Loa under the lens: An analysis of the least mastered competencies in Grade 8 science. 7th CAREConAt: Cavite Conference.
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational psychology review, 22(2), 123-138.
Tabamo, A. J. C. (2023). The use of primary literature in teaching science as a strategy in addressing surface learning: A synthesis. Xavier-Ateneo School of Education. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.4.723.46962
Tweed, A. (2009). Challenges in teaching complex scientific concepts: Overcoming obstacles with resources and strategies. Science Education Review, 8(1), 1–7.
United Nations. (2015). The sustainable development goals (SDG 4: Quality education, SDG 13: Climate action). United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Retrieved from https://sdgs.un.org/goals
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, N. (2022). Effective video solutions for earth science education. The University of Texas at Dallas. https://utd-ir.tdl.org/bitstreams/92125749-b152-41e3- 8040- b194e62dc2af/download
Yuliati, L., Wasis, & Widodo, S. (2018). Using simulations to improve high school students' understanding of physics concepts. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1), 012040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/01204