Humanistic Buddhism in Thailand

Humanistic Buddhism in Thailand

ผู้แต่ง

  • Hakmany Ounephaivong Gautam Buddha University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.

คำสำคัญ:

Humanistic Buddhism, Thailand, Buddhist Ethics, Social Engagement, Modern Buddhism

บทคัดย่อ

Humanistic Buddhism is a modern interpretation of traditional Buddhist teachings that emphasizes engagement with contemporary society, ethical living, and social responsibility. In Thailand, Humanistic Buddhism has played a significant role in shaping social values, education, and community development. This paper explores the development, principles, and impact of Humanistic Buddhism in Thailand, focusing on its role in promoting social welfare, ethical leadership, and harmonious living. The study examines key Thai Buddhist leaders and institutions that have contributed to the dissemination of Humanistic Buddhist ideals, such as Wat Phra Dhammakaya and the work of the late Phra Buddhadasa Bhikkhu. Additionally, this research highlights the challenges and criticisms of Humanistic Buddhism in Thailand, particularly regarding its adaptation to modernity and its interaction with political and economic structures. The findings underscore the relevance of Humanistic Buddhism as a transformative force in Thai society, fostering moral integrity and social cohesion while addressing contemporary issues such as poverty, education, and environmental sustainability.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739-768.

Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.

Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85-105.

CDC. (2022). Building a resilient public health system. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Cheng, Y. (2004). Humanistic Buddhism: A blueprint for life. Buddha’s Light Publishing.

Darlington, S. (2012). The ordination of a tree: The Buddhist ecology movement in Thailand. State University of New York Press.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. Macmillan.

DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’. IT & Society, 1(5), 1-24.

Frey, C. B., & Osborne, M. A. (2017). The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerization? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 114, 254-280.

Gethin, R. (1998). The foundations of Buddhism. Oxford University Press.

Guterres, A. (2021). Strengthening multilateralism in a divided world. United Nations Report.

Harvey, P. (2013). An introduction to Buddhism: Teachings, history and practices. Cambridge University Press.

Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359(1449), 1435-1446.

IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

Jackson, P. A. (2013). Buddhadasa: Theravāda Buddhism and modernist reform in Thailand. Silkworm Books.

McDaniel, J. (2011). The lovelorn ghost and the magical monk: Practicing Buddhism in modern Thailand. Columbia University Press.

Morozov, E. (2011). The net delusion: The dark side of internet freedom. PublicAffairs.

Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge University Press.

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77.

Puntasen, A. (2007). Buddhist economics: Evolution, theories and its application to various economic subjects. Chulalongkorn University Press.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.

Swearer, D. K. (2010). The Buddhist world of Southeast Asia. State University of New York Press.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Nelson-Hall.

Tufekci, Z. (2017). Twitter and tear gas: The power and fragility of networked protest. Yale University Press.

UNEP. (2021). The role of green innovation in achieving sustainable development. United Nations Environment Programme.

United Nations. (2022). Paris Agreement and global climate policy. United Nations Climate Change.

WHO. (2021). COVID-19 and global health equity. World Health Organization.

World Bank. (2021). Global economic prospects: Post-pandemic recovery and challenges.

Zizek, S. (2009). First as tragedy, then as farce. Verso.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

ไฟล์ประกอบ

เผยแพร่แล้ว

01-01-2024

รูปแบบการอ้างอิง

Ounephaivong, H. . (2024). Humanistic Buddhism in Thailand : Humanistic Buddhism in Thailand . BUDDHO, 3(1), 11–20. สืบค้น จาก https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Buddho/article/view/1473

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

บทความทบทวนทางวิชาการ
Bookmark and Share