Enhancing Ethical Leadership and Good Governance of Local Government Executives in the Context of the 21st Century

Authors

  • Suphanne Payubutr Mahamakut Buddhist University, Yasothon Buddhist College
  • Kanta Srilah Mahamakut Buddhist University, Yasothon Buddhist College
  • Worachet Tho-un Mahamakut Buddhist University, Yasothon Buddhist College

Keywords:

Ethical Leadership, Good Governance, Local Administrators, Public Administration, Sustainable Local Development

Abstract

This article aims to explain and propose approaches for developing ethical leadership and good governance among local administrators in response to the challenges of the twenty-first century. The study is based on a synthesis of theories and academic literature related to leadership, ethics, and public governance, combined with an analysis of contemporary local administrative contexts. The article argues that ethics serves as the foundation for exercising power in the public interest, while good governance provides institutional mechanisms that promote transparency, accountability, and citizen participation in local administration. In the era of digital transformation, local administrators face increasing challenges, including demands for greater transparency, intensive public scrutiny through networked societies, complex public issues, and persistent risks associated with patronage systems and conflicts of interest. The article suggests that local leaders should cultivate key attributes such as integrity, fairness, public accountability, value-based decision-making, exemplary conduct, and digital ethical awareness. At the organizational level, governance principles should be strengthened through transparency, accountability, rule of law, equity, efficiency, and responsiveness to community needs. Furthermore, the article proposes a three-level development framework consisting of: (1) individual-level development focusing on ethical competencies and decision-making skills; (2) organizational-level development emphasizing transparent organizational culture, open information systems, and continuous learning; and (3) policy-level development aimed at strengthening oversight mechanisms, ethical incentives, and collaborative governance among multiple stakeholders. The proposed framework is expected to reduce corruption risks, enhance public service performance, strengthen public trust, and promote sustainable local development. The article also highlights the importance of future studies on ethical leadership assessment tools and the relationships among leadership, organizational culture, and governance outcomes in local contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

จันทร์พิรุณ มหาหิงค์. (2566). ภาวะผู้นำเชิงจริยธรรมของผู้บริหารสถานศึกษา สังกัดสำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษาขอนแก่น เขต 3. วิทยานิพนธ์ปริญญาศึกษาศาสตรมหาบัณฑิต มหาวิทยาลัยมหามกุฏราชวิทยาลัย.

นนทภูมิ มะโนนึก และคณะ. (2565). ภาวะผู้นำเชิงจริยธรรมของผู้บริหารในองค์กรปกครองส่วนท้องถิ่น. วารสารการบริหารนิติบุคคลและนวัตกรรมท้องถิ่น. 8 (7), 415-428.

พระมหาอานนท์ อคฺคปญฺโญ และพระสิริรัตนเมธี. (2566) ภาวะผู้นําเชิงจริยธรรมของผู้บริหารท้องถิ่น. วารสารพุทธศาสตร์ มจร อุบลราชธานี. 5 (3), 511-522.

ศุภมา จิตต์เที่ยง และคณะ. (2567). หลักธรรมาภิบาลกับบทบาทของนักการเมืองท้องถิ่น. วารสารพุทธนวัตกรรมและการจัดการ. 7 (1), 248-259.

Asian Development Bank (ADB). (1999). Governance in Thailand: Challenges, issues, and Prospects. Manila: Asian Development Bank (ADB).

Brown, M. E. and Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical Leadership: A Review and Future Directions. The Leadership Quarterly. 17 (6), 595-616.

Brown, M. E., et al. (2005). Ethical Leadership: A Social Learning Perspective for Construct Development and Testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 97 (2), 117-134.

Chardchawarn, S. (2010). Local Governance in Thailand: The Politics of Decentralization and the Roles of Bureaucrats, Politicians, and the People. Chiba: Institute of Developing Economies (IDE).

CLGF. (2022). Cities, Climate Change Adaptation and Sustainable Development: The Role of Local Government in Commonwealth Small Island Development States. London: Commonwealth Local Government Forum.

Haque, M. S. (2010). Decentralizing Local Governance in Thailand: Contemporary Trends and Challenges. International Journal of Public Administration. 33 (12-13), 673-688.

Kalshoven, K., et al. (2011). Ethical Leadership at Work (ELW): Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure. The Leadership Quarterly. 22 (1), 51-69.

Meechan, S. (2020). Clientelistic Network in the 2019 Thai General Election: Evidence from Roi-Et Province. Social Science Asia. 6 (4), 1-20.

OECD. (2024a). OECD Regions and Cities at a Glance 2024. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2024b). Global Trends in Government Innovation 2024: Fostering Human-Centred Public Services. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2025). Government at a Glance 2025. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Open Government Partnership (OGP). (n.d.). OGP Local Circle on the 2030 Agenda and SDGs. Retrieved 15 June 2026, from https://www.opengovpartnership.org/ogp-local/local-community/2030-agenda-circle/

UNDP. (2022). Digital Strategy 2022–2025. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

UNDP. (2023). From Vision to Action: Explaining UNDP’s Digital Transformation Framework. New York: One United Nations Plaza.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-07

How to Cite

Payubutr, S., Srilah, K., & Tho-un, W. (2026). Enhancing Ethical Leadership and Good Governance of Local Government Executives in the Context of the 21st Century. Journal of Academic Humanities, 3(3), 1–12. retrieved from https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jah/article/view/3105