Epistemic Uncertainty in the Era of Information Overload

Authors

  • Itthiphol Manowong Police Training Center, Royal Police Cadet Academy (RPCA)
  • Mongkol Thepkasetkul Independent Scholar

Keywords:

Epistemic Uncertainty, Knowledge, Information Overload, Media Literacy

Abstract

This academic article aims to study the uncertainty of knowledge in an era of information overload. The study finds that, in conditions where information flows continuously, in the absence of principles for critical evaluation, the use of information and knowledge tends to be dominated by bias, leading to erroneous processing and decision-making based on inaccurate information, affecting people’s beliefs and leading to negative social consequences. On the contrary, if information is carefully examined within an appropriate conceptual framework, the processing and utilization of information can help promote society, generate innovation beneficial to humankind and support social development under the principle of the rule of law. This article proposes an epistemologically flexible framework that integrates critical thinking and media literacy with the principles of the Kalama Sutta, the Three Characteristics, Yonisomanasikara, and mindfulness and communication ethics, supplemented with technological approaches for verifying the origin of media, to transform information overload into verifiable knowledge, reducing bias, misinformation, and fake news at both individual and societal levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

พระพรหมคุณาภรณ์ (ป.อ. ปยุตฺโต). (2559). พุทธธรรม ฉบับปรับขยาย. กรุงเทพมหานคร: ผลิธัมม์.

พระมหานิธิ ถิรธมฺโม (พรมขาว) และคณะ. (2568). ทฤษฎีความรู้ของนักปรัชญาตะวันออก. วารสารเสียงธรรมจากมหายาน. 11 (3), 342-352.

มหามกุฏราชวิทยาลัย. (2557). พระไตรปิฎกและอรรถกถาแปล เล่ม 27, 33, 34, 37, พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 9. นครปฐม: โรงพิมพ์มหามกุฏราชวิทยาลัย.

Bodhi, B. (2012). The Numerical Discourses of the Buddha: A Comple Translation of the Anguttara Nikaya. Boston: Wisdom Publications.

Foucault, M. (2000). The Subject and Power. In Faubion, J. (ed.). Power: Essential Works of Foucault, 1954-1984, Vol. 3. New York: The New Press.

Heuer, R. J., Jr. (1999). The Psychology of Intelligence Analysis. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of Intelligence.

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lahlou, S. (28 April 2025). Mitigating Societal Cognitive Overload in the Age of AI: Challenges and Directions. Retrieved 2 October 2025, from https://arxiv.org/html/2504.19990v1

Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Menczer, F. and Hills, T. (1 December 2020). Information Overload Helps Fake News Spread, and Social Media Knows It. Retrieved October 2, 2025, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/information-overload-helps-fake-news-spread-and-social-media-knows-it/

Thibault, D. (2025). Disconnect to Reconnect: Practical Approaches to Managing Social Media's Impact on Pediatric Mental Health. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 39 (2), 292-296.

Vosoughi, S., et al. (2018). The Spread of True and False News Online. Science. 359 (6380), 1146-1151.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Manowong, I., & Thepkasetkul, M. (2026). Epistemic Uncertainty in the Era of Information Overload. Journal of Academic Humanities, 3(2), 72–83. retrieved from https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/jah/article/view/2934