DEVELOPMENT OF THE TOOL FOR MEASURING STUDENT TEACHERS’ UDL ACTION COMPETENCY

Authors

  • Palakorn Chanboon Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University
  • Kanit Sriklaub Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University
  • Watinee Amornpaisarnloet Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University

Keywords:

Universal Design for Learning (UDL), UDL Action Competency, Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

Abstract

This research aims to develop and examine the tool for measuring student teachers’ UDL action competency. The developed questionnaire consists of 12 items and has a five-point rating scale. A total of 92 student teachers; a group of non-research sample, but have attribute similar to the sample who participate in teaching practice in 2019 completed the survey. The data were analyzed and content validity is a measure based on IOC value, internal consistency reliability is a measure based on Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and construct validity is analyzed by first order confirmatory factor analysis. Results showed that the UDL competency model has content validity (IOC, 1.00) and the constructs are considered valid and reliable (Cronbach’s alpha, .70 - .87). The UDL action competency model has the Goodness of Fit criteria (χ2 (1, N = 92) = 2.867, p = .09, CFI = .982, TLI = .946, RMSEA = .142, SRMR = .033) so that the model fits and suitable to be measured student teachers’ UDL action competency.

References

นงลักษณ์ วิรัชชัย. (2012). การวิเคราะห์องค์ประกอบเชิงยืนยัน. Journal of Research and Curriculum Development, 68-74.

Alquraini, T. A., & Rao, S. M. (2020). Assessing teachers’ knowledge, readiness, and needs to implement Universal Design for Learning in classrooms in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(1), 103-114.

Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford publications.

CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines version 2.2. Retrieved from http://udlguidelines.cast.org

Courey, S. J., Tappe, P., Siker, J., & LePage, P. (2013). Improved lesson planning with universal design for learning (UDL). Teacher education and special education, 36(1), 7-27.

Craig, S. L., Smith, S. J., & Frey, B. B. (2019). Professional development with universal design for learning: supporting teachers as learners to increase the implementation of UDL. Professional Development in Education, 48(1), 22 -37. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1685563

Griful-Freixenet, J., Struyven, K., & Vantieghem, W. (2020). Toward More Inclusive Education: An Empirical Test of the Universal Design for Learning Conceptual Model Among Preservice Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 72(3), 381-395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487120965525

Hair, J. F. (2011). Multivariate data analysis: An overview. International encyclopedia of statistical science, 904-907.

Hall, T. E., Meyer, A., & Rose, D. H. (2012). Universal design for learning in the classroom: Practical applications. Guilford press.

Hickey, E. (2021). Designing Learning Through Universal Design for Learning. In Teacher as Designer (pp. 41 -52 ). Springer.

Howard, S. K., Tondeur, J., Ma, J., & Yang, J. (2021). What to teach? Strategies for developing digital competency in preservice teacher training. Computers & Education, 165, 104149.

Ilomäki, L., Paavola, S., Lakkala, M., & Kantosalo, A. (2016). Digital competence–an emergent boundary concept for policy and educational research. Education and information technologies, 21(3), 655-679.

King-Sears, M. (2009). Universal design for learning: Technology and pedagogy. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32(4), 199-201.

Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. Springer publishing company.

Lombardi, A., Vukovic, B., & Sala-Bars, I. (2015). International Comparisons of Inclusive Instruction among College Faculty in Spain, Canada, and the United States. Journal of postsecondary education and disability, 28(4), 447-460.

Lowrey, K. A., Classen, A., & Sylvest, A. (2019). Exploring Ways to Support Preservice Teachers' Use of UDL In Planning and Instruction. Journal of Educational Research & Practice, 9(1), 261.

Lowrey, K. A., Hollingshead, A., Howery, K., & Bishop, J. B. (2017). More Than One Way: Stories of UDL and Inclusive Classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(4), 225-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917711668

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing research.

Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. T. (2014). Universal design for learning: Theory and practice. CAST Professional Publishing.

Panayides, P. (2013). Coefficient alpha: interpret with caution. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(4).

Rose, D. H., & Meyer, A. (2002). Teaching every student in the digital age: Universal design for learning. ERIC.

Story, M. F. (2001). Principles of universal design. Universal design handbook.

Waltz, C. F., & Bausell, B. R. (1981). Nursi ng research: design statistics and computer analysis. Davis Fa.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31

How to Cite

Chanboon, P., Sriklaub, K., & Amornpaisarnloet, W. (2022). DEVELOPMENT OF THE TOOL FOR MEASURING STUDENT TEACHERS’ UDL ACTION COMPETENCY. Journal of Education Research, Faculty of Education, Srinakharinwirot University, 17(2), 1–13. retrieved from https://so13.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JERf/article/view/2745