DEVELOPMENT OF AN ACTIVE LEARNING MANAGEMENT MODEL TO ENHANCE 4Cs SKILLS OF DIGITAL-AGE LEARNERS IN PHRAPARIYATTIDHAMMA SCHOOLS, GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, AREA 8
Keywords:
Active Learning, 4Cs skills, Digital-age learners, Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, Research and DevelopmentAbstract
This study aimed to develop and validate an Active Learning management model to enhance 4Cs skills—critical thinking, creativity, collaboration, and communication—among digital-age learners in Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, General Education Department, Area 8. The research employed a three-phase Research and Development (R&D) design: (1) investigation of current instructional conditions and problems, (2) model development and expert validation, and (3) model implementation and effectiveness evaluation. The situational analysis involved 175 administrators and teachers selected through stratified random sampling from a population of 320. The implementation phase included 40 students. Research instruments comprised questionnaires, a model evaluation form, lesson plans, a 4Cs skills assessment form, and a satisfaction survey. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, dependent samples t-test, and effect size (Cohen’s d).
Findings indicated that overall instructional management was at a high level ( = 4.12, S.D = 0.48), while instructional problems were at a moderate level ( = 3.21, S.D = 0.56). The developed model consisted of four systematic components: clearly defined 4Cs-based learning outcomes, structured Active Learning activities, digital technology integration, and authentic assessment. The model was rated at the highest level of appropriateness by experts (= 4.63, S.D = 0.41). After implementation, students’ 4Cs skills significantly improved (pre-test = 3.18, S.D = 0.52; post-test M = 4.35, SD = 0.44; t = 12.87, p < .001), with a very large effect size (Cohen’s d = 2.04). The results demonstrate strong empirical evidence that a systematically designed Active Learning model can substantially enhance 21st-century skills in the context of Buddhist general education schools.
References
วิจารณ์ พานิช. (2555). วิถีสร้างการเรียนรู้เพื่อศิษย์ในศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพมหานคร: มูลนิธิสยามกัมมาจล.
สุคนธ์ สินธพานนท์. (2560). การจัดการเรียนรู้ในศตวรรษที่ 21. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
พระราชบัญญัติการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2542. (2542, 19 สิงหาคม). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา, เล่ม 116 ตอนที่ 74 ก, หน้า 1–23. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักเลขาธิการคณะรัฐมนตรี.
พระราชบัญญัติการศึกษาพระปริยัติธรรม พ.ศ. 2562. (2562, 16 เมษายน). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา, เล่ม 136 ตอนที่ 50 ก. กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักเลขาธิการคณะรัฐมนตรี.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. George Washington University.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). Framework for 21st century learning definitions. Battelle for Kids. Tucson, AZ: Author.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 วารสารการพัฒนาสังคมและพลเมืองสมัยใหม่

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which allows others to share the article with proper attribution to the authors and prohibits commercial use or modification. For any other reuse or republication, permission from the journal and the authors is required.

