RECONSTRUCTING THAI AESTHETIC ON SHORT-VIDEO PLATFORMS: A COMMUNICATION ART PERSPECTIVE

ผู้แต่ง

  • Qinghao Guo Ph.D. in Communication Arts Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University, Thailand

คำสำคัญ:

Thai aesthetic, Short-video platforms, Communication art, Platform aesthetics, Cultural reproduction

บทคัดย่อ

This academic article examines how Thai aesthetic sensibilities are reconfigured within short-video platforms under contemporary conditions of platformization and algorithmic circulation. Rather than treating short-video media as neutral channels for cultural dissemination, the article conceptualizes platforms as aesthetic infrastructures that actively reshape modes of visual expression, narrative rhythm, and affective engagement. Drawing on communication art theory (Dewey, 1934/2005; Silverstone, 1999), cultural reproduction (Williams, 1981), and platform aesthetics (Manovich, 2013; Couldry & Hepp, 2017), the article develops a theoretical argument illustrated through brief analytical examples from Thai short-video practices. It argues that Thai aesthetic is not diminished in short-video environments but reconstructed through processes of visual condensation, stylistic repetition, and affective anchoring. By reframing short-video platforms as sites of aesthetic negotiation, this article contributes to communication art scholarship and advances theoretical understanding of digital cultural aesthetics beyond representational or empirical paradigms.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.

Bourdieu, P. (1993). The field of cultural production: Essays on art and literature. Columbia University Press.

Bucher, T. (2018). If…then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press.

Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. Unwin Hyman.

Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Polity Press.

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.

Dewey, J. (2005). Art as experience. Perigee Books. (Original work published 1934)

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.

Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press.

Hall, S. (1997). Encoding/decoding. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, media, language (pp. 128–138). Routledge. (Original work published 1980)

Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatization of culture and society. Routledge.

Kraidy, M. M. (2005). Hybridity, or the cultural logic of globalization. Temple University Press.

Manovich, L. (2013). Software takes command. Bloomsbury Academic.

Manovich, L. (2016). Instagram and contemporary image. University of San Diego. http://manovich.net/index.php/projects/instagram-and-contemporary-image

Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics. Continuum.

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2001). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. (2nd ed.). Blackwell.

Silverstone, R. (1999). Why study the media? Sage.

Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. University of Chicago Press.

Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and literature. Oxford University Press.

______. (1981). Culture. Fontana Press.

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2026-02-27

ฉบับ

ประเภทบทความ

บทความวิชาการ