THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPETENCY OF NETWORK BUILDING FOR KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, PHRAPARIYATTIDHAMMA SCHOOLS, GENERAL EDUCATION SECTION, BANGKOK, THAILAND

Abstract

The objectives of this research were 1) to study the results of the developmental model of the competency of network building for knowledge management of Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, General Education Section Bangkok, Thailand, 2) to study the results of the use of the developmental model of the competency of network building for knowledge management, Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, General Education Section and 3) to analyze the factors and conditions of the developmental model of network building for knowledge management used in Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, General Education Section.

Research Methodology was divided into 3 steps, 1) the process of documentary studying, 2) the process of studying the results of the models using and 3) analysis of factors and conditions of the use of the developmental model of network building for knowledge management used in Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, General Education Section with qualitative, Quantitative, and action research.

The findings were as follows;

1. The formulation of network building; the providing of knowledge management; transfer; exchange; distribution; and in the storage of information and various aspects of development were as follows; skills, attitudes, values, and leadership characteristic, motivation or internal driving force.

2. The participation in resource sharing and then used as a strategy to determine the action plan for competency development; creating a network for knowledge management according to the rules mutual agreements with tracking and evaluate the results of every operation.

3. In regard to the results of the study of the using of development model of the competency of network building for knowledge management of Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, General Education Section was found that most administrators and teachers of Phrapariyattidhamma Schools, General Education Section did not have a clear policy to formulate strategy of a network building for knowledge management. Most of them did not have the criteria for transferring, lack of motivation or internal driving force and lack of participation in the formulation of rules, agreements and performance evaluation.