Models in Professional and Doctorate Degree Research
บทคัดย่อ
Models serve crucial roles in professional and doctoral research across disciplines. This overview examines various model types: conceptual, mathematical, algorithmic, and physical models. Models represent key research problems and enable outcome explanation or prediction. Strong conceptual models provide explanatory frameworks, while mathematical models enable quantitative analysis. algorithmic models implement concepts and allow virtual experimentation through simulations. Physical prototypes test practical concepts and solutions effectively. Model development requires iterative evaluation and refinement against evidence and theory. Effective model communication through visualizations remains essential for research impact. However, modeling faces limitations including necessary simplifications, assumptions, and unknowns. Researchers must leverage model strengths while acknowledging inherent limitations for rigorous inquiry
Downloads
เอกสารอ้างอิง
American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, Seventh Edition. Retrieved January 19, 2024, form https://apastyle.apa.org/products/publication-manual-7th-edition
Babyak, M. A. (2004). What you see may not be what you get: A brief, nontechnical introduction to overfitting in regression-type models. Retrieved June 14, 2024, Form https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1097/01.psy.0000127692.23278.a9
Bailer-Jones, D. M. (2002). Models, metaphors and analogies. Retrieved June 22, 2024, Form http://www.zolaist.org/wiki/images/a/ad/Models,_Metaphors,_and_Analogies.pdf
Barredo Arrieta, A., & Gleeson, J. P. (2021). Why small is beautiful: The physics of nanosized biological and biomimetic systems. Physics Today, 74(6), 40–47.
Bass, F. M. (2004). Comments on "a new product growth for model consumer durables the bass model". Management Science, 50(12), 1833–1840.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Retrieved June 1, 2024, form https://www.ucg.ac.me//skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
Duarte, N. (2008). Slide:ology: The art and science of creating great presentations. Retrieved June 10, 2024, from https://books.google.co.th/books?id=aSXdz_-aFqYC&printsec=copyright&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Epstein, J. M. (2008). Why model?. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 12-22
Evans, J. H. (2020). Physical models and laboratory techniques in coastal engineering. Retrieved June 16, 2024, from https://www.worldscientific.com/worldscibooks/10.1142/2154?srsltid=AfmBOooAupNlh2E_co4ujbIKReisBkrrWHKqie7Y6KkUReVpYINLtQ00#t=aboutBook
Few, S. (2013). Information dashboard design: Displaying data for at-a-glance monitoring. Retrieved July 22, 2024, form https://www.amazon.com/Information-Dashboard-Design-At-Glance/dp/1938377001
Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Leon-Guerrero, A. (2018). Social statistics for a diverse society. Retrieved June 10, 2024, Form https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/social-statistics-for-a-diverse-society-9-257698
Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2020). Models in science. Retrieved June 8, 2024, Form https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/models-science
Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Kumar, N. (2006). Make, buy, or ally: A transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794670
Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (2000). Developing models in science education. Retrieved June 19, 2024, form https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-94-010-0876-1
Harrison, J. R., Lin, Z., Carroll, G. R., & Carley, K. M. (2007). Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1229–1245. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586485
Hegarty, M. (2011). The cognitive science of visual-spatial displays: Implications for design. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3(3), 446–474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2011.01150.x
Hughes, B. P., & Wacker, G. (2021). Prototyping: A technology of the engineering design process. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 80(5), 16–20.
Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2010). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. Retrieved July 3, 2024, form https://e.itg.be/MTM/qmm/2.pdf
Jordan, M. I., & Mitchell, T. M. (2015). Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science, 349(6245), 255–260. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8415
Kaplan, A. (1964). The conduct of inquiry: Methodology for behavioral science. Retrieved July 1, 2024, Form https://www.amazon.com/Conduct-Inquiry-Methodology-Behavioral-Science/dp/0765804484
Kelley, T., & Littman, J. (2001). The art of innovation: Lessons in creativity from IDEO, America's leading design firm. Retrieved June 9, 2024, form https://www.amazon.com/Art-Innovation-Lessons-Creativity-Americas/dp/0385499841
Ladyman, J., Lambert, J., & Wiesner, K. (2013). What is a complex system?. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 3(1), 33–67.
Liu, C. Y., Zhang, Y., & Shan, X. T. (2018). Current Situation, Problems and Improvement Measures for the Implementation of University Online General Education Courses. New Curriculum Research, No. 3, 129-131.Retrieved February 22, 2024, form https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3016800
Mouton, J., & Marais, H. C. (1990). Basic concepts in the methodology of the social sciences. Retrieved July 20, 2024, from https://books.google.co.th/books/about/Basic_Concepts_in_the_Methodology_of_the.html?id=VO2THQaF6oIC&redir_esc=y
Newman, M. (2011). Complex systems: A survey. American Journal of Physics, 79(8), 800–810. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1112.1440
Odenbaugh, J. (2011). True lies: Realism, robustness, and models. Philosophy of Science, 78(5), 1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.1086/662281
Pishdad, B. P., Gao, X., Eastman, C., & Self, A. P. (2013). Planning and developing facility management-enabled building information model (FM-enabled BIM). Automation in Construction, 87, 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.004
Romer, D. (2000). Keynesian macroeconomics without the LM curve. Journal of Economic perspectives, 14(2), 149–169. doi: 10.1257/jep.14.2.149
Rykiel Jr, E. J. (1996). Testing ecological models: the meaning of validation. Ecological modelling, 90(3), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(95)00152-2
Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students. Retrieved July 2, 2024, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/240218229_Research_Methods_for_Business_Students
Schmidhuber, J. (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: An overview. Neural Networks, 61, 85–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2014.09.003
Sterman, J. D. (2002). All models are wrong: reflections on becoming a systems scientist. System Dynamics Review, 18(4), 501–531. Retrieved January 2, 2024, Form https://web.mit.edu/jsterman/www/All_Models_Are_Wrong_(SDR).pdf
Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137
Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information. Retrieved January 10, 2024, Form https://kyl.neocities.org/books/%5BTEC%20TUF%5D%20the%20visual%20display%20of%20quantitative%20information.pdf
Vancouver, J. B. (2010). Living systems theory as a paradigm for organizational behavior: Understanding humans, organizations, and social processes. Behavioral Science, 55(2), 165–204 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bs.3830410301
Wacker, J. G. (1998). A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00019-9
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Retrieved January 8, 2024, from https://ebooks.umu.ac.ug/librarian/books-file/Case%20Study%20Research%20and%20Applications.pdf
ดาวน์โหลด
เผยแพร่แล้ว
รูปแบบการอ้างอิง
ฉบับ
ประเภทบทความ
สัญญาอนุญาต
ลิขสิทธิ์ (c) 2025 มหาวิทยาลัยธนบุรี
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความนี้ได้รับการเผยแพร่ภายใต้สัญญาอนุญาต Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ซึ่งอนุญาตให้ผู้อื่นสามารถแชร์บทความได้โดยให้เครดิตผู้เขียนและห้ามนำไปใช้เพื่อการค้าหรือดัดแปลง หากต้องการใช้งานซ้ำในลักษณะอื่น ๆ หรือการเผยแพร่ซ้ำ จำเป็นต้องได้รับอนุญาตจากวารสาร
